MPOETC Act 120 Practice Exam 2026 – Complete Test Prep Guide

In closing arguments, the prosecutor's primary role is to summarize the case and present a compelling narrative that persuades the jury of the defendant's guilt. This phase is critical because it allows the prosecutor to consolidate the evidence presented during the trial, highlight the key points, and frame the narrative in a way that aligns with the charges and the law.

Starting and closing the argument emphasizes the prosecutor's responsibility to not only introduce their case at the beginning of the trial but also to tie everything together at the end, reinforcing their position and reminding the jury of the evidence that supports their claims. This continuity helps to ensure that the jury understands the prosecutor's perspective throughout the entire process, ultimately aiding in their decision-making.

Introducing new evidence is not permissible in closing arguments, as this part of the trial must focus on the evidence already presented. Questioning witnesses similarly falls outside the scope of closing arguments, as that occurs during the trial when evidence is being actively presented. A final rebuttal is typically reserved for the defense after the prosecution's closing, where they have the opportunity to counter the prosecutor's arguments directly. Thus, the role of starting and closing the arguments is central to a prosecutor's responsibilities in the courtroom.